<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on MY CONVERSION TO CONSERVATIVE ALMOST COMPLETE</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:21:50 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Schopenhauer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-6745</link>
<description>So what took you so long? The case against liberalism has always centred on their prejudice against prejudice -in the broad Burkean sense of the word. Your evident addiction to irony implies a continuing reluctance to face this fact. How many 9-ll&#039;s will it require to finally bring liberals down from their  conceptualist high? Also - have you considered the role of the internet itself in shaping your disaffection with 
  the left ? The &quot;new underground&quot; (Richard Poe) is slowly, ineluctably burying the left.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6745@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:21:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dirk Deppey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3193</link>
<description>This thread is further proof of the old adage: &quot;Liberals look for heretics, conservatives look for converts.&quot; If you&#039;re looking for clues as to why modern liberalism seems so impotent in today&#039;s political climate, just scroll up.

Incidentally, I voted for McCain twice when I still lived in Arizona (and would gladly do so again). Does this make me a member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy or not? I&#039;ve lost track.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3193@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:55:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3190</link>
<description>McCain&#039;s an exception; and furthermore, he doesn&#039;t serve in the Administration, where Perle,W, Cheney, Rove, and the rest of the civilian War Criminals-In-Training sit, planning to send ordinary teenagers off to do their dirty work, cheered on by the witless Olsens, among others. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3190@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:15:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3187</link>
<description>You mean like John McCain?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3187@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:27:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3181</link>
<description>Clinton dodged the draft, yes, but so did Bush. He went into the Texas Guard to avoid service, and then went AWOL from THAT.  The rest of the so-called chickenhawks took similar cop-outs when confronted with actually having to fight for their country.

The typical Republican behavior: they exempt themselves from the behavior they demand of everyone else. 

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3181@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:00:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3169</link>
<description>Um....wasn&#039;t it Clinton who DODGED the draft?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3169@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:17:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3168</link>
<description>And the intelligent point you wish to make Slim is.....? I am waiting.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3168@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:17:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by slimshady</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3157</link>
<description>So Dawn, what you&#039;re saying is you&#039;ve become a conservative because it will help you replace lost income due to being an underemployed toilet scrubber? Your belief system is scrubbing bubbles clean! </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3157@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:35:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Conservatives Against the War</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3150</link>
<description>And this:

http://www.amconmag.com/10_21/iraq.html

And this:

http://www.amconmag.com/11_4/bushs_grand_strategy.html

And this:

http://www.amconmag.com/11_4/militarism_and_the.html


IF YOU SUPPORT THE WAR, YOU&#039;RE BASICALLY JUST ANOTHER LIBERAL!!!!!!  REAL CONSERVATIVES OPPOSE THE WAR!!!!  READ THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MAGAZINE AND LEARN THE TRUTH!!!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3150@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:47:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Real Conservatives Oppose the War</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3149</link>
<description>Try this:

http://www.amconmag.com/10_7/the_road_to_folly.html</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3149@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:40:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3147</link>
<description>Well Chickenshit, I mean Chickenhawk, are they as spineless as you who uses a fake name and email.

Oh, Jeebus people. Some of you whiny ass Liberals make me embarrassed to have ever been so dogmatic and unrealistically inflated with self-righteousness.

I have yet to see ONE intelligent refute to why we shouldn&#039;t be removing Saddam from power. Not one.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3147@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:30:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ChickenHawk Republican Scum</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3140</link>
<description>I&#039;m A ChickenHawk Republican, A Coward and a Hypocrite.

My name is Rush Limbaugh, George W. Bush,  Richard Perle, Paul Wolfie, Bill Kristol, and so on and on.

When it came time to fight for my country back in the 60s, I didn&#039;t actually do that.  What I did was chicken out, get a deferrement, all sorts of other excuses. Nope, didn&#039;t fight.

But I feel perfectly comfortable sending young men to fight in a war.  That&#039;s because, like most pro-war Republicans bullies, I&#039;m a basically a spineless coward. Also, I cheat on my taxes.

Chop off my head and watch me run!!!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3140@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:20:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by : Yet Another Conservative Against the War</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3139</link>
<description>Yet Another Conservative Against the War!

Thanks, Jude!  You&#039;re the best

&quot;Take a sad song and go out and get &#039;em........&quot;

http://polyconomics.com/

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3139@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:12:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Yet Another Conservative Against the War</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3138</link>
<description>Supply Sider Jude Wanniski comes out against the slaughter.  Hey, Jude, you were made to go out and get&#039;em!

http://polyconomics.com/

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3138@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:08:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3125</link>
<description>^and that sums it up really good.

I like that mentality.

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3125@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:17:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3123</link>
<description>Color me sell-out ya&#039;ll, but my priorities are the following: feeding, housing, clothing my family. Then paying extra bills, then perhaps the occasional luxury item, like shampoo and dishsoap.

I scrub floors and toilets to pay my way.  Don&#039;t call me anything but hardworking or I will bust your ass.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3123@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:05:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3122</link>
<description>Wow Slim....you must be outraged!


It would be really funny if that was the real Slim Shady calling someone a sell out haha</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3122@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:32:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by slimshady</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3120</link>
<description>The alleged former bleeding heart liberals turned compassionless conservatives posting seem to have burned their membership cards because they could get a few more shillings back from Unkkkle Scam. You sold your souls to the man for love of the green! For shame!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3120@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:52:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JP</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3119</link>
<description>Stop confusing liberals with Democrats. If you&#039;re expecting coherent left-wing criticisms of Bush from Democrats, you&#039;re bound to be disappointed.  The Democrats&#039; move to the center-right has left this country without a mainstream liberal voice.

Contending that conservatism is the only recourse because Democrats have not inspired you reveals the superficiality of your own &quot;liberalism&quot;.  If you can&#039;t come up with your own principled criticism of Bush from the left, maybe you were never a liberal to begin with.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3119@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:36:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3101</link>
<description>Bravo, Dawn! Yours is an unpopular view among this crowd, though I believe a common one. I, too, did not vote for Bush, but I&#039;ve been impressed overall. I think anyone without a raging hard-on for the man has, too. 

Like you, I received a nice check two years ago from the Republicans, and paid less taxes last year, too. Now I&#039;m looking at paying even less. Bush&#039;s tax plan looks like it will save me $1592 on my taxes from here on out, while the Democrats appear to be pitching a plan just like the one they criticized Bush for last year. I would get either $600 or $1200 (reports vary) from the Democrats, this year only.

Let them argue about the average (mean) versus the median all they want to. I&#039;ve done the math. I&#039;m not rich, and I stand to save some serious bank.

Anyway, Bravo for listening for yourself and making up your own mind. I wish others could do that too, but I fear that we are hearing more of the same from the crowd that supported a Democratic president as he sent troops to fight in Rwanda and Bosnia/Herzegovina and Somalia and so on, but suddenly, with a Republican in the White House, they&#039;re anti-war. 

Guess what, I&#039;m anti-war, too. Almost as much as I&#039;m anti-genocide and anti-dying-a-miserable-death-at-the-hands-of-terrorists-with-nerve-gas and anti-let-the-harmless-dictator-wipe-the-jews-off-the-map.

War isn&#039;t the best option, but it&#039;s the best option left.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3101@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:06:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BIG AL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3099</link>
<description>A few posts up, it mentions something about Bush believing in people taking care of themselves? Are you doing lines with the prez, Buddy?  Monkey boy is the beneficiary of a lifetime of entitlement. He is a scoundrel of below average intelligence who has been bailed out of everything from failed business dealings,  to going to war himself, and being busted for his prolific drug use, basically getting a free ride all of his life. You shouldn&#039;t risk nuclear war if you can&#039;t pronounce it. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3099@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:38:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Conservatives Against the War</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3096</link>
<description>Conservatives Against the War Party

Anyway, our mission is in great part to counter the disastrous projects of the War Party.  We have titled our magazine The American Conservative &amp;ndash; and stand ready to initiate a campaign within conservative ranks to keep the country from being led off the cliff by the War Party. 


http://www.antiwar.com/mcconnell/mc-col.html</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3096@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:16:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3087</link>
<description>as a leftist, i used to be outraged, but now i&#039;m just amused.

I&#039;ll be sure to share your, uh, thoughts with the tons of conservatives, Republicans, and libertarians who are showing up at the anti-war meetings I go to. 

it&#039;s sad you&#039;ve been seduced by pro-war &quot;conservatives.&quot;  I suggest you read a real conservative magazine before you sign off on the U.S.&#039;s transition from republic to Empire. 

http://www.amconmag.com/</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3087@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:01:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3082</link>
<description>I don&#039;t think the speech did much for union members, and I think this Bush guy is actually a goon. But I did like his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lgcma.com/PopYouInThePooper.mp3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;theme song&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, you mean the other left?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3082@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:56:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/29/102845.php#comment-3079</link>
<description>I think you are more of a hawk liberal, as am I. The words &quot;conservative&quot; and &quot;liberal&quot; have been drained of much of their meaning anyway - many of us, maybe most of us, take a cafeteria approach to politics and policy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3079@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:00:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>