<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Weekend Slammer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:03:22 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Dana Blankenhorn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/27/133944.php#comment-3092</link>
<description>True &quot;Hacking&quot; Lives 

Back in the day (as the kids say today) a &quot;good hack&quot; was a tiny program that executed very quickly and did something very big. The word was powerful because computers weren&#039;t, so efficiency was a necessity.

Computer criminals wound up purloining the term in the 1990s, much to the dismay of their elders, so that the word &quot;hacking&quot; now generally means someone breaking into someone else&#039;s box, either to steal from it or deface it.

Well, the nasty worm that disabled Microsoft SQL databases (and some ATM nets) last weekend combined the two definitions. The worm, dubbed &quot;Sapphire,&quot; was just 376 bytes. This meant it was small enough to come in a single packet on a packet network. 

If you don&#039;t want to be bothered by this nasty hack, get the Microsoft patch, make sure it works, then enjoy the irony. Then tremble a bit, because once a trick is learnt, it don&#039;t get unlearnt. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3092@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:03:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>