A New Reality?
Published January 25, 2003
The current wave of reality TV shows, and their frightening success, is leading many in the industry to talk of new business paradigms, grand new vistas of cheaper programming, a no-repeat program calendar (that part's fine with me), and the return of many prodigal young viewers from cable and the like.
All I can say is that viewer taste looks a lot more like a cycle than a straight line to me - I'm glad to see some of the less giddy realizing this:
- Since CBS's "Survivor" rushed to the top of the Nielsen ratings three years ago, network executives have known that reality shows can be enormously popular. This week convinced them that the shows will drastically alter the economics of the business itself.
Executives from all four major networks watched in awe as reality shows won 15 of 18 half-hour time periods on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday nights, and finished second in the other three time slots. "American Idol," on the Fox network, led the way, drawing 25 million viewers two nights running and becoming the most-watched nonsports shows in the network's history.
The success of shows like "American Idol," "The Bachelorette" on ABC and "Joe Millionaire" on Fox was so impressive that numerous executives said they were now ready to embrace plans for a radical restructuring of the network business, which previously had been talked about only as dimly possible, long-term adjustments.
Not only will reality shows continue to flood network's schedules next fall, but television executives are also predicting such developments as an end to the traditional television season. Instead of the time-honored formula of introducing shows en masse in September and ending them in May, broadcast networks want to stagger the shows' debuts and banish repeats from the schedule almost entirely. [NY Times]
- Many of the executives emphasized that they were far from abandoning the scripted series as the backbone of network schedules. Several network executives said they would not consider cutting back on budgets for developing scripted shows, citing ABC's calamitous decision to do that when it had "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" showing as many as four nights a week. When that show tumbled in the ratings, the network did not have promising shows in the pipeline to replace it.
"It's going to be about balance," Mr. Zucker said, emphasizing the advantage NBC has enjoyed with higher-quality scripted shows that play especially well with upper-income well-educated viewers, whom advertisers pay a premium to reach.
....Even as the networks revel in the success of the reality wave, however, a quiet minority expressed some reservations.
"It feels a little like the stock market," said Lloyd Braun, the chairman of ABC Entertainment. "Those who put all their money into this might end up looking foolish in the end."
- A New Reality?
- Published: January 25, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: News, Video: Television
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
When you talk about a no-repeat program calendar, I know what you mean, but I wish there were *more* repeats on television. That is, I think every show ought to air at least twice, HBO-style. That way, when I miss Buffy on Tuesday night because my wife wants to watch American Idol, I can just set my PVR to record Buffy's encore presentation a couple of nights later in the middle of the night.
Yeah, I know, I should be able to record one thing while watching another, but it's satellite, and I've only got the one receiver/tuner.
The point is, the encore presentation should happen before next week's episode, so people don't fall behind. I had to call a coworker to tape it!
There has been some of that - Fox did it last year with 24. Te hproblem is what do you decide to repeat? There isn't enough room for everything and most shows are bad. I suppose there is the cable angle: the networks could their cable affiliates for the repeat.
Reality T.V.?
Geez, come on, there is no such thing. My wife is in this industry, and as she said to me once:
"Everything is controlled, nothing is left to chance." They'll script something in a heartbeat.
Even the Osbournes have proven to have been scripted when necessary. Reality T.V. is an oxymoron. It will always be the world as 'they' want us to see it, reflected back at us.
Excellent point Darrell, and very true. that has been one of my biggest complaints against them. But they aren't scripted in the same way a created show is and they don't require actors - that's what the networks are creaming about.



I, for one, am happy to see the death of sitcom television. The television unions have been agitating for years for higher pay for actors and writers - costs that ultimately get passed on to viewers (in a roundabout way, but just so). Now reality shows avoid actors and writers - AND pull in huge ratings.
Good. Now instead of the culture of celebrity, everybody can be a celebrity for a little while.