American Public Supports Restricted Media in Wartime

Written by Eric Olsen
Published January 18, 2003

Howard Kurtz reports in the Washington Post on a new poll reaffirming that the public wants the press to stay out of the military's nutsack when the bombs are flying:

    Two-thirds of the public believes the government should have the right to stop the media from disclosing military secrets, says an ABC News poll released yesterday.

    Fifty-six percent of those surveyed also say news organizations are more obliged to support the government in wartime than to question the military's handling of the war.

    The poll, done for a "Nightline" town meeting airing tonight, reflects the widespread view that press freedoms, including the First Amendment's ban on prior restraint, should give way to Pentagon preferences in wartime. The findings, which mirror those during the Persian Gulf War, come at a time of widespread leaks about the Bush administration's plans for a possible war with Iraq.

    Such findings could bolster the administration's efforts to tightly restrict the flow of information about the showdown with Iraq. "Whether the public supports everything the press does, it is our free press that distinguishes us from any other country on the planet," said John McWethy, ABC's Pentagon correspondent. "In time of war, it gets a heck of a lot tougher for reporters to do their jobs. There are more restrictions, especially with this administration, on difficult-to-find information."

    Pentagon spokeswoman Torie Clarke said she doesn't see a conflict between military secrecy and robust coverage, which her department hopes to provide by assigning reporters to travel with combat units.

    "Information about military operations can do grave damage to the mission and put people's lives at risk," Clarke said. "I think the press understands the need for operational secrecy and not putting people's lives at risk."

    Overall, the ABC poll says, six in 10 Americans say the government's ability to keep wartime secrets in more important than a free press, while 34 percent disagreed. Even in peacetime, 28 percent say the government should have the right to control what information the media report.

    But journalists received high marks for their coverage of the current buildup against Baghdad. Thirteen percent say the media have been too supportive of the Bush administration, 17 percent say they have been too critical and 61 percent say "about right."

I think it has been "about right" also: I have heard plenty about the antiwar movement and every concern regarding why we should not go to war, but I also get the feeling that the American media in general understands the necessity.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
American Public Supports Restricted Media in Wartime
Published: January 18, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Culture Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/2692)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments