Pride and Prejudice

Written by Al Barger
Published January 14, 2003

It seems hard to believe, but as recently as January 14, 1963 (within my lifetime, barely), George Wallace was sworn in as governor of Alabama, promising in the infamous words of his inaugaral address "segregation now; segregation tomorrow; segregation forever!"

As one particularly enjoyable bit of evidence of his failure, exactly nine years later, January 14, 1972 marked the premiere of Sanford and Son on NBC. Already we were past any necessity of self-conscious civil rights posturing; it was just a show about a funny old dude who owned a little junkyard. Oh, and he was black. More significantly he was REDD FOXX- one of the funniest sumbitches to ever get in front of a camera.

These decades later, Redd Foxx is a beloved staple of tv reruns, and Wallace stands as a discredited symbol of petty evil southern segragationist politics- to the extent that he is remembered at all. Well duh. Who would you want to spend YOUR time with?

Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly and sometimes candidate Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at MoreThings.com, what with the paranoid religious visions and the Pentacostal music and visions of God and Sarah Palin and anarchy running amok and such. Somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of NEW ALBUM RELEASES.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Pride and Prejudice
Published: January 14, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Books: Biography, Books: History, Books: Nonfiction, Video: Urban, Video: Comedy, Video: Television
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Books: Biography
Books: History
Books: Nonfiction
Video: Urban
Video: Comedy
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 14, 2003 @ 10:09AM — Jane [URL]

Actually, I never see, and never want to see again, Sanford and Son.

However, George Wallace was a much more complex figure, and deserves a more prominent place in modern American history than you give him credit for. He was far from being a cartoonish segregationist, and whether you like it or not, he symbolizes both racism and the capability to change that marked many southern politicians in the 1960s and 70s.

#2 — January 15, 2003 @ 02:06AM — Al Barger [URL]

Re: Wallace's "capability to change"

I'm WAY less than impressed with Wallace's late life conversion. From what I've gathered, it appears that Wallace personally didn't harbor anything close to the animosity toward blacks regularly displayed in his public actions. It was just something to do to get votes. In my book, this makes him FAR worse.

I give not a rat's ass about his private "complexities." In practice, it was pretty simple: cheap racial demagoguery appealing to the worst nature of southerners. That was his issue. This was what he was elected to do. "Cartoonish" or not, this is what he chose to stand for. This is what he will be remembered for.

In short, he was just another worthless political hack- with a particularly ugly if then common schtick.

Also, you're really missing out on Sanford and Son. You find the turd gurgling political hack GEORGE WALLACE more worthwhile than Redd Foxx? What kind of f'd up value system gives you that result?

#3 — January 15, 2003 @ 09:09AM — Eric Olsen

Southern politician "change of heart" is better than the alternative regardless of era or even motivation, but era and especially motivation are relevant in determining how much credit the politician should get for same: in Wallace's case, not much.

#4 — August 3, 2003 @ 11:49AM — Dew

Not at all Eric, I can't believe it but I agree totally with Al. The fact that Wallace practiced what he did not believe makes him a far worse threat to society. He denied millions in the state of Alabama and his racist tyrannical babble spilled over into Mississippi (where I live, born and raised) and other southern states.

Wallace had influence and to think he manipulated the ignorant ideologies of so many misguided souls pisses me off more because it was even more unnecessary. It proves he was in office for status not change and that is and always will be the worse type of politician.

Screw that old hypocrite, give me Grady anyday!

#5 — August 3, 2003 @ 14:39PM — Al Barger [URL]

Also, a "change of heart" from a hack politician is not the only alternative. The other, better alternative is for the public to simply turn on them, and sweep the jackasses out the door.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/2605)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments