<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on "When I Was Cruel" by Elvis Costello</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:04:26 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/10/230920.php#comment-2794</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;All This Useless Beauty&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Brutal Youth&lt;/i&gt; are great Elvis albums?  Lord have mercy, I can&#039;t quite remember a single hook on the first, and only maybe &quot;Kinder Murder&quot; as anything like a classic song on the latter.  Those are precisely the absolutely LEAST inspired records he&#039;s made.

Also, the Imposters, his current backing band that were the central players on this outstanding album are simply the Attractions with a new bass player.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2794@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:04:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/10/230920.php#comment-2790</link>
<description>I too, bought &quot;When I Was Cruel&quot; the week it came out, I&#039;ve been an Elvis Costello fan since 1978, have the badges and everything.

&quot;When I Was Cruel&quot; isn&#039;t a bad album, but it isn&#039;t a great album. It&#039;s just ok, and I expect better from Elvis Costello.

I think the album is a symptom and example of how lacklustre mainstream rock and pop music in 2002.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2790@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:27:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Lindholm</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/10/230920.php#comment-2789</link>
<description>Cort,

Sorry, that timeline was a little misleading.  I purchased the CD as soon as it came out.  The Grammy nomination made me think of it and, right before I wrote the review, I gave it yet another listen - probably my 4th or 5th.  It&#039;s a mess.

Your &quot;standout&quot; tracks are, to me, instantly forgettable.  I can&#039;t even recall &quot;Alibi&quot;, &quot;Tart&quot; is a misfire of strained vocals, and...what?...&quot;dance&quot; to &quot;Spooky Girlfriend&quot;?  What kind of dance would that be?

Thanks for your comments.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2789@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:54:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cort Fritz</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/01/10/230920.php#comment-2784</link>
<description>Wrong wrong wrong.

Since when do &quot;huge Elvis fans&quot; pick up his latest album only when they hear it has been nominated for a Grammy?

I admit that my first few listens didn&#039;t enthrall me.  But sometime in the second week I had the album I became hooked.  

If you are looking for classic quality Elvis check out Alibi.  It&#039;s witty, poisonous and crushingly human.  Listen to Tart which is fascinating and the lyrics are beautifully crafted.  

Or grab a dance partner (you still dance, right?) and get flat out *down* to Spooky Girlfriend.  Yeah, it&#039;s silly and fun.  So sue him.

Don&#039;t love blogging more than thinking.  Don&#039;t just post immidiately after your first cursory listen.  Christ, give an album more than a week before you pan it.  In fact here is your rule from now on.  Whatever your longest stretch of sour grumpy moodiness is, a week, a month, whatever.  Give an album at least twice that before you chase everybody else off, ok?

Ok.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2784@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2003 12:01:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>