Trent Lott: Great Hair, Bad Brain

Written by Eric Olsen
Published December 11, 2002

I'm way late on the Trent Lott-is-a-racist-Dixiecrat-who-doesn't-want-to-place-his-lips-near-the-same-drinking-fountains-as-blacks theme, but better late than never.

First, check out Oliver Willis's cool multimedia presentation on same - graphic representation is often more powerful than a welter of words alone. Oliver rocks, hard.

I won't rehash the story, which is everywhere, but I will predict that Lott will be forced out a Majority Leader, his hole is just too deep. His words were so jarring, his apologies so passionless and perfunctory, that no one has cried "political correctness" in his defense. This is amazing if you think about it.

Reinforcing Lott's explicit endorsement of segregation at the Thurmond tribute is the fact that HE SAID THE EXACT SAME THING 22 YEARS AGO. CNN reports:

    "You know, if we had elected this man 30 years ago, we wouldn't be in the mess we are today," Lott was quoted as saying in an article that appeared November 3, 1980, in The Clarion-Ledger, a Jackson, Mississippi, newspaper.

    Those comments came at a Jackson campaign rally for Ronald Reagan and followed a speech by Thurmond, who praised the platform that would soon put Reagan in the White House.

    "Clearly Sen. Lott was expressing his support for Ronald Reagan's policies of smaller government and fiscal responsibilities," a statement released by Lott's office late Tuesday said.

More important than the fate of one man - an old-school Southern racist asshole - is the shocking reminder that racism IS NOT a thing of the past, that educated, famous people in positions of power are still racist, and that the Civil War is STILL not over, 137 years later. There are still prominent, educated, popular, powerful Americans who long for an America of mint juleps and genteel cotillions for "people like us," while the black folks sing spirituals and pick cotton out back.

And people wonder why the Confederate flag is still such an offensive, potent symbol to millions, especially black Americans? Because the war isn't over yet. Maybe this flap will force Americans to face up to this ugly, embarrassing, atavistic reality, and finally deal with it in an open manner: you can't put something in the past when it isn't past.

Let us throw Trent Lott on the political funeral pyre not because he violated unspoken rules about public propriety - let us fry his well-coiffed ass because what he believes is still preventing us from becoming the kind of people we like to think we are.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Trent Lott: Great Hair, Bad Brain
Published: December 11, 2002
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Culture Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 11, 2002 @ 22:11PM — Rodney Welch [URL]

As a South Carolinian who has endured more than his share of cornball tributes over the past year to that crumbling piece of parchment known as Strom Thurmond, I must admit to a certain amount of schadenfreude that, in the words of Ben Folds, Thurmond's redneck past is once again nipping at his heels.

#2 — December 12, 2002 @ 10:14AM — Eric Olsen

Rodney, If it was only "redneck," that would be one thing, but aggressively racist is another. At least Thurmond has recanted his past and "changed his mind" - what is Lott's excuse?

#3 — December 15, 2002 @ 03:13AM — Bob

You guys are just another bunch of left-wing media radicals trying to stir things up and create more racial division.

Although Lott's comments may show his lack of intelligence or communication abilities they dont necessarily show or prove that he is a racist.

The democrats are just upset because the republicans are taking the black votes.Without the black votes the democrats have no political future.

Calling Lott a racist and the south being full or racists is just part of the typical liberal hysteria that occurs when they want to push some agenda.

It would be hard to believe that Lott is a racist after being in politics for so long from a state with a large black population.

He was 7 years old when Thurmond was running for president and grew up during the transition from segregation to integration.

You got to remember that segregation was the status quo in the south at that time so there will always be remnants of that but things are progressing away from that.

Its not perfect but it is getting better. Ive been to the south many times and the people there dont think and act in such harsh racial lines as in 1948. There is a feeling of coming together both white and black and finding a common ground. They are starting to just consider themselves southerners regardless of race.

How can the old problems ever be fixed when the past is always dredged up?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/2218)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments