<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on "Give Me That"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:42:29 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/25/100804.php#comment-2230</link>
<description>Thanks Brad, though I didn&#039;t do a whole lot of &quot;reporting&quot; - I did some mean &quot;interpreting though!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2230@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:42:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brad Hill</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/25/100804.php#comment-2229</link>
<description>Eric -- It&#039;s a breath of fresh air to see you frame this story as a matter of civil rights, not RIAA vs. patriotism. When the RIAA tried to insert its agenda into the Terrorist Bill, *that* was a breach of patriotism. But as far as we know, the responsibility for this wild incident rests with the Navy, not the RIAA. Perhaps some back-room politicking will come to light. In the meantime, I&#039;ll take your reporting over the sensationalized coverage in The Register any day.

Brad</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2229@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:35:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>