<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Rolling Stones, revisited and rerolled</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 05:37:02 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/19/020407.php#comment-2142</link>
<description>Augh. I can&#039;t believe I made that error. I&#039;ll correct it right away. Thanks, Eric...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2142@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 05:37:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean Hackbarth</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/19/020407.php#comment-2141</link>
<description>I recently bought &lt;i&gt;Forty Licks&lt;/i&gt; so I could have something by the Stones in my collection.  The sound was great.  Drums came out and slapped me in the face, and the guitar was clear.  The songs were tremendous.  The 2-disk set showed me why people consider them to be THE greatest rock and roll band.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2141@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:16:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/19/020407.php#comment-2140</link>
<description>Excellent  - can&#039;t wait to hear them myself. By the way, it&#039;s &quot;What a drag it is GETTING old.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2140@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:30:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>