Roswell 2002

Written by Eric Olsen
Published November 18, 2002
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

This report in the Skeptic's Newsletter comes to the same conclusion:

    Independent investigations by two UFO researchers and the U.S. Air Force have discovered what crashed 75 miles north of Roswell, leaving behind unusual debris found by rancher Mac Brazel on June 14, 1947. It was a balloon-borne radar corner reflector that was part of a then-Top Secret Project Mogul designed to use giant, high-flying balloons to detect Soviet nuclear explosions. The first UFOlogist to discover the Project Mogul/Roswell debris connection was Robert G. Todd, Ardmore, Pa., a respected sharp-eyed researcher whose efforts focus on using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain once-classified documents.

    More recently, UFOlogist Karl Pflock also discovered the Roswell/ Project Mogul connection. It will be reported in Pflock's 170-page report on his investigation of the Roswell Incident to be published soon by the Fund for UFO Research (FUFOR). Pflock is married to Mary Martinek — a senior member of the staff of New Mexico Congressman Steve Schiff who triggered the current General Accounting Office (GAO) investigation into the Roswell Incident. Pflock recently told a friend: "I'm firmly convinced that something from Project Mogul was involved in the Roswell incident."

    The USAF, which has launched an extensive investigation in response to a GAO request, also recently discovered the Project Mogul/Roswell connection. As part of the USAF's research effort it has conducted an "electronic search" of several million pages of documents at the Air Force Historical Research Agency archives without finding a singl mention of the Roswell incident or of a UFO or ET bodies at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Roswell 2002
Published: November 18, 2002
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: News, Video: Television
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: News
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 23, 2002 @ 01:36AM — Anonymous_Chicken

My Review:

"THE ROSWELL CRASH: STARTLING NEW EVIDENCE." 8PM Eastern time, Sci-Fi Channel, 11/22/02.
"It is a shame that such a serious national interest has been reduced to this."
"The Feds are laughing all the way to Mars. This mockery suits their purpose tenfold."

Poor Bryant Gumbel. He has reduced himself to the fraud and journalistic flimflammery of Geraldo and "Al Capone's Vaults." Geraldo was going to get it out of the vaults and Gumble seen it go into the vault. Not a word was revealed about what was dug up at dig. That was the hook, "startling new evidence," to get the viewers and the ratings for the first show and what was dug up will be the fodder for the sequel, crap on top of crap. This is the third time I've seen this format. The last time was about what they possibly would find in the pyramid. The second can be no more of a sham than the first so I'm wondering who will throw away their hard earned journalistic integrity to do part two as Gumble did the first or will Gumble further dig his hole deeper by doing part two, surely discrediting his career forever. Geraldo has few fans after his vaults escapade so Gumble from now on will be "second rate." Who could take him seriously doing the news anymore after this screen version of a tabloid reporter? To take such work he must be hurting for money. There was no "smoking gun" evidence on the show. All they offered was typical hollywood hype and more people/?witnesses? offering nothing but more words. Words is all they ever had in the first place. No bodies, no wreckage, no nothing but words. Obviously there is no longer any serious investigation of the Roswell Incident.

Anonymous_Chicken

#2 — November 23, 2002 @ 01:37AM — Anonymous_Chicken

My Review:

"THE ROSWELL CRASH: STARTLING NEW EVIDENCE." 8PM Eastern time, Sci-Fi Channel, 11/22/02.
"It is a shame that such a serious national interest has been reduced to this."
"The Feds are laughing all the way to Mars. This mockery suits their purpose tenfold."

Poor Bryant Gumbel. He has reduced himself to the fraud and journalistic flimflammery of Geraldo and "Al Capone's Vaults." Geraldo was going to get it out of the vaults and Gumble seen it go into the vault. Not a word was revealed about what was dug up at dig. That was the hook, "startling new evidence," to get the viewers and the ratings for the first show and what was dug up will be the fodder for the sequel, crap on top of crap. This is the third time I've seen this format. The last time was about what they possibly would find in the pyramid. The second can be no more of a sham than the first so I'm wondering who will throw away their hard earned journalistic integrity to do part two as Gumble did the first or will Gumble further dig his hole deeper by doing part two, surely discrediting his career forever. Geraldo has few fans after his vaults escapade so Gumble from now on will be "second rate." Who could take him seriously doing the news anymore after this screen version of a tabloid reporter? To take such work he must be hurting for money. There was no "smoking gun" evidence on the show. All they offered was typical hollywood hype and more people/?witnesses? offering nothing but more words. Words is all they ever had in the first place. No bodies, no wreckage, no nothing but words. Obviously there is no longer any serious investigation of the Roswell Incident.

Anonymous_Chicken

#3 — November 23, 2002 @ 01:38AM — Anonymous_Chicken

My Review:

"THE ROSWELL CRASH: STARTLING NEW EVIDENCE." 8PM Eastern time, Sci-Fi Channel, 11/22/02.
"It is a shame that such a serious national interest has been reduced to this."
"The Feds are laughing all the way to Mars. This mockery suits their purpose tenfold."

Poor Bryant Gumbel. He has reduced himself to the fraud and journalistic flimflammery of Geraldo and "Al Capone's Vaults." Geraldo was going to get it out of the vaults and Gumble seen it go into the vault. Not a word was revealed about what was dug up at dig. That was the hook, "startling new evidence," to get the viewers and the ratings for the first show and what was dug up will be the fodder for the sequel, crap on top of crap. This is the third time I've seen this format. The last time was about what they possibly would find in the pyramid. The second can be no more of a sham than the first so I'm wondering who will throw away their hard earned journalistic integrity to do part two as Gumble did the first or will Gumble further dig his hole deeper by doing part two, surely discrediting his career forever. Geraldo has few fans after his vaults escapade so Gumble from now on will be "second rate." Who could take him seriously doing the news anymore after this screen version of a tabloid reporter? To take such work he must be hurting for money. There was no "smoking gun" evidence on the show. All they offered was typical hollywood hype and more people/?witnesses? offering nothing but more words. Words is all they ever had in the first place. No bodies, no wreckage, no nothing but words. Obviously there is no longer any serious investigation of the Roswell Incident.

Anonymous_Chicken

#4 — November 9, 2006 @ 02:07AM — polly

"Point of impact" was very wrong on "THE ROSWELL CRASH: STARTLING NEW EVIDENCE". This is because they kept looking at the point where the craft came to rest as the point of impact..... WHY???

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/1910)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments