What's Your Point?

Written by Eric Olsen
Published November 17, 2002

Steve Chapman sounds like a Euroweenie here:

    Wouldn't it be nice to be rid of Saddam Hussein? That's how the Bush administration has managed to frame the debate over war with Iraq. In its cheerful scenario, there really won't be much of a fight: Our peerless military will crush all resistance, the Iraqi army will quickly disintegrate, the dictator will meet his just fate, and Iraq will enter the community of civilized nations under American tutelage.
Disingenuous set up: the situation is far more urgent than "wouldn't it be nice to be rid of Saddam." Chapman's grand solution: um, he doesn't have one.
    A poison gas attack on Tel Aviv could precipitate a nuclear strike against Baghdad, killing hundreds of thousands and creating unimaginable repercussions.

    Could anything be worse than that? Maybe so. Daniel Benjamin, co-author of the new book, "The Age of Sacred Terror," points out that in the chaos of war, Iraq's worst weapons could be smuggled to Al Qaeda by enterprising military officers or by Saddam Hussein, intent on exacting revenge against America by any means possible--creating what Benjamin calls "the greatest proliferation disaster in history."

    It was possible to deter Saddam Hussein from using chemical and biological weapons. But those weapons may soon be in the hands of fanatical terrorists who can't be deterred--ready for use whenever Osama bin Laden gives the word.

    Americans are looking forward to a brief, easy conflict that will make the world a safer place, and they may very well get it. But they should also realize that more than any war we've fought in the past half-century, this one carries the real risk of catastrophe.

Every war risks catastrophe, every breath you take comes with it a worst case scenario. It seems to me even/particularly under Chapman's dire possibilities, we'd better get in there with massive force as quickly as possible and take care of this mess rather than waiting for it to come to us. A double squeeze on Saddam and al Qaeda at the same time would seem to be our best approach.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
What's Your Point?
Published: November 17, 2002
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Culture Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 22, 2005 @ 03:01AM — benel barak

this is one of the greatest books ive ever read (and ive read alot of em) if anyone has the authors emails i ask please forward iot to me i would like them to know what i thought about it and ask them a few follow up questions,

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/1876)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments