<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Hip-Hop the Vote</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:55:35 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/04/152341.php#comment-1855</link>
<description>I think the number is somewhere around 2/3, but that isn&#039;t the main point - my point was that the writer ignores this rather salient fact about sales completely and seems to equate the &quot;hip-hop generation&quot; with black youth and young adults. Clearly this is a black-originated phenomenon and one that continues to evolve via &quot;black urban trends&quot; as you say, but to ignore the role of whites - even just as consumers - seems odd.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1855@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:55:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cal Ulmann</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/11/04/152341.php#comment-1854</link>
<description>I would say whites purchase more than 2/3.  I think it&#039;s somewhere in the 90s.
Whites are part of the hip-hop generation but who do they follow?  They follow the black urban trends that make up the hip-hop culture.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1854@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:23:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>