<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Vanity Fair: The Music Issue!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:07:12 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by john burgess</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/29/134837.php#comment-1745</link>
<description>thanks for the affirmation of the incredibly lame vf music issue. and you are absolutely right: a golden opportunity was missed to tell the great stax records story.
just because some jackass in austin came up with some catchy crit about cheryl crow doesn&#039;t mean you need to spread it around. she&#039;s got the goods!
my first visit (via scrubbles)- won&#039;t be the last.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1745@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:07:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/29/134837.php#comment-1744</link>
<description>Nice review PD, thanks. I have skirted around the outside of the issue, but now feel no guilt for having not plunged in.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1744@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:20:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>