<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Ayn Rand&#039;s fear of cold sores</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:22:45 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Moony on Ayn Rand&#039;s fear of cold sores</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/20/103648.php#comment-683585</link>
<description>Ed, that would be &#039;The Virtue of Selfishness&#039;, &lt;i&gt;selflessness&lt;/i&gt; being something of which she very definitely did not approve! Interesting mistake, though.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">683585@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:22:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Spangler on Ayn Rand&#039;s fear of cold sores</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/20/103648.php#comment-640527</link>
<description>In a nutshell, Rand was morally bankrupt.  The convservative notion that repeats If I&#039;m left alone to do well and others will benfit&quot; ad naseum is, and always will be the philosophy of a kindergarten student who won&#039;t share the crayons.

Why does anyone, anywhere ever take anything this verbose and untalented writer/thinker seriously?  She was a joke.  Get over it Ayn, and fellow Objectivists... we all need each other, like it or not. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">640527@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:32:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bliffle on Ayn Rand&#039;s fear of cold sores</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/20/103648.php#comment-639511</link>
<description>I read one or two of those Ayn Rand screeds when I was 21 and considered them naive. She&#039;s an embarrassment to the very ideas she supports.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">639511@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:28:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Guy on Ayn Rand&#039;s fear of cold sores</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/20/103648.php#comment-639405</link>
<description>I think you hit the nail on the head. Ayn Rand&#039;s good ideas exist, and consist, essentially, of repeating, with reactionary intensity, that &quot;freedom is good,&quot; over and over again. Working through a love/hate relationship, or being especially selective in picking out passable elements in any given text, is simply not worth it. The fact your ex-girlfriend loved her mother doesn&#039;t mean she was fun to be around. For all the emphasis on &quot;objectivity,&quot; she resorts to categorical argumentation than taking a stab at, say, science, which might have to do with the fact that the postwar social sciences were only backing up about half of her assertions, and certainly none of her forays into misdirected rage or paranoia. On the fiction side...I&#039;ve never seen quite as many displays of callous macho men demolishing overtly devious straw men and unidimensional mice. In order to be readable, the opposition would need credible motivation, and the faintest sniff of pragmatism to flavor the air. I don&#039;t know of a Intro to Fiction teacher that doesn&#039;t warn against didactic storytelling- she was absent that day.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">639405@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:25:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>