When Did It Happen?

Written by Dean Esmay
Published October 18, 2002
page 1 | 2 | 3

As anyone who remembers that era knows, it was simply considered axiomatic: conservatives were nonintellectual, not very well-educated, not very bright. Or they were dangerous. Not much else.

Yet, a bit over 50 years after Lionel Trilling wrote the words I quote above, one Charles Krauthammer, in the summer of 2002, wrote the following:

To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.

The entire column is worth reading. But an important thing to keep in mind is that Krauthammer isn't being sarcastic. This isn't some barb he's throwing at his liberal opponents. He means it.

He's not the first to say it. In March of this year, David Galernter said, "I hate to put it in such bald terms. But right-wingers are just smarter than left-wingers. A lot of people didn't feel that they could say it. But since September, it has become slightly easier to admit that you have your doubts about some aspects of the liberal agenda."

Once again, an important thing to keep in mind is that Gelernter isn't being sarcastic. This isn't some barb he's throwing at his liberal opponents. He means it.

You can argue as to whether or not Galernter is right, but you can't argue with Krauthammer about what conservatives have come to believe. Nor is this a childish, "We're not stupid! You're stupid!" argument. Conservatives just plain believe this. Most would, I hazard to guess, consider it axiomatic. As one guy I know put it: Anyone who thinks tax cuts in the 1980s caused deficits, when you can go right to the U.S. Treasury's web site and see that it ain't so, is just plain dumber than dirt. How can you treat someone like that seriously?

It's also hard not to notice, when surveying the American political landscape at the moment, that there are no great Liberal intellectuals anymore. There are a few bright-minded self-described liberals; Robert Reich comes to mind, as does Susan Estrich. Camille Paglia has a truly original and interesting mind. But aside from a few rare exceptions, most "liberal" argumentation seems to come from one of four places:

1) People who disagree with me are racist.
2) People who disagree with me are warmongers who glory in violence.
3) People who disagree with me want the poor to starve and suffer.
4) People who disagree with me are blinded by corporate brainwashing.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
When Did It Happen?
Published: October 18, 2002
Type:
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: History, Books: Nonfiction
Writer: Dean Esmay
Dean Esmay's BC Writer page
Dean Esmay's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Dean Esmay
Books: History
Books: Nonfiction
All Books Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 18, 2002 @ 20:15PM — Henrik Mintis

The Republican trend began with Reagan, who adopted ideas from Goldwater, a wise man if not an intellectual. The Democrat trend began with LBJ, Goldwater's nemesis. Liberalism started creeping toward socialism and government control. Nixon was more liberal than JFK, and the Republicans collapsed, pending Reagan. Carter was more liberal than LBJ, and the Democrats collapsed, pending Clinton.

During the 1990s, science became increasingly popular, and computers made documentation and statistical computation easy. We can track the effects of opinions and laws more precisely now. We passed "workfare" and saw positive feedback. We passed gun control laws, and saw negative ones. We bonded with North Korea in 1994, and learned its outcome today. Call it "outcomes-based public policy". Moynihan's grandiloquent class could justify any idea with educated rhetoric, but today's arguments sound much stronger when backed by living data.

The Republicans' turning point was Buchanan's leaving. Him gone, the Republicans today are the true liberals (in the sense of our founders and the free market proponents of the 19th and 20th centuries), and the Democrats have become socialist fascists. The Democrats' turning point was 9/11. The party maintained success issuing narcissistic rhetoric, and pandering to sub-groups, but has finally come to the edge of a cliff. Reagan lifted Republicans from the depths, and Dubya is standing on the shoulders his father would not. Clinton took the Democrats to the tippy-top of the mountain they started climbing in 1963, and 9/11 pushed them off the edge. Their collapse is not pretty, but beautiful.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/1380)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments