Blogcritics: Comments on Where's the kung-fu?

Comment by Marco

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:12:29 EDT

Yes, this post is "real" but so what? I could write an equally "real" post about what I had for breakfast today, but nobody cares. Criticism is supposed to have something interesting or insightful to say to make it worth reading. Good, bad, best, worst, bleh. Who cares?

Comment by Dirk Deppey

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 02:15:56 EDT

Umm -- for those spelling mistakes up there in the previous post? Just assume I was talking to you with my mouth full of peanuts. [Ronch ronch ronch!] Mmmm, peanuts.

Comment by Dirk Deppey

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 02:12:09 EDT

Repeat after me: "Jackie Chan is pushing fifty." Again: "Jackie Chan is pushing fifty." He's going to be getting slower and slower, and less able to do the kind of Bruce-Lee-meest-Buster-Keaton coolass shtick fow which he's been reknowned for thirty years. I haven't seen the new film yet, but if Shanghai Noon was any indication, he's trying to transition himself away from the films he used to do because -- wait for it -- "Jackie Chan is pushing fifty." Don't get me wrong. It isn't a bad thing that you don't like this or want to say so. That's fine. It is, however, pretty useless.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:35:26 EDT
I like this post: it's real, written from a fan's perspective, and doesn't pull punches. The spelling is fixed. We always link to Amazon, that's how we're (slightly) funded. Buy something why don't you.

Comment by Marco

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:08:51 EDT
This is a terrible post. It seems like it is nothing but an excuse to post your Amazon affiliate links. You should not post again until you learn to check your spelling and come up with something interesting to say.