Rhapsody: They Still Don't Get It

Written by BJ Johnson
Published October 04, 2002
page 1 | 2

Still, the music Rhapsody did have turned out to be good promotion for the record industry. After listening to a long list of records on my wishlist, I'm going to buy all but one of them. (Here's a sample: Epitaph, You Are #6, Stereo, and Black Brown and Beige.) Of the records I heard, only one got demoted to "buy later, if at all." That's why it is so frustrating that the industry seems unwilling to let me hear things online before buying them — it's great promotion.

After all that, what online music service would I pay for?

Let the record show that I am willing to pay for music online. Sure, I can get a free version of most songs on a file sharing network. But the quality is inconsistent, and putting together an entire album is a huge pain in the ass.

For my money, the record business can compete with free. They can give me consistent and easy.

There are two models that seem to make sense. First, they could charge a monthly fee and allow downloads. That's the emusic.com model. (I'll review that next; I'm a fan, despite its flaws.)

Second, they could have a free or nominal monthly charge for a jukebox service like Rhapsody, plus an option to pay for each download. Given that the label wouldn't have to pay for distribution or producing the disk, they could probably charge far less than retail and still make money. (Footnote: for either model, I'm assuming that file compression will continue to get better, so a download really is "CD quality." Right now, mp3's and the like really aren't.)

Finally, once I get a song, I need to be able to move it to CD or an mp3 player. That's only fair. And if I make a mix for a friend, consider it promotion.

Here's my deal: if the industry offers me a good online product at a fair price, I promise not to put the files online for the world to copy. Sure, a second group will always seek out free, but given the hassle involved and a genuine desire on the part of most fans to see bands get paid, I'll bet more people would join me.

In their quixotic quest to eliminate the second group, the industry is throwing away an opportunity to make money off the first, and in the end, all of us are poorer for it.

For more information see the Blogcritics posts here and here.

A version of this entry first appeared on Robbed by a Fountain Pen.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Epitaph Epitaph
Charles Mingus
Music,
You Are #6: More Music for Six Musicians You Are #6: More Music for Six Musicians
Don Byron
Music,
Black, Brown and Beige Black, Brown and Beige
Duke Ellington
Music,
Stereo Stereo
Paul Westerberg
Music,

Rhapsody: They Still Don't Get It
Published: October 04, 2002
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: News
Writer: BJ Johnson
BJ Johnson's BC Writer page
BJ Johnson's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by BJ Johnson
Music: News
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 5, 2002 @ 14:31PM — Paul

Good article.
And it raises the question: How can the labels continue to get away with calling streamed and downloaded music "CD Quality" when by all measures (subjective and objective) it isn't? Is anyone lobbying to kill this lie?

Bad quality is one of the main issues that keeps me from enjoying downloaded music (legal or otherwise). To my ears 320k mp3s sound very good, but you never see them.

Paul

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/1069)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments