<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Rhapsody: They Still Don't Get It</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:31:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Paul</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/10/04/015140.php#comment-1190</link>
<description>Good article.
And it raises the question: How can the labels continue to get away with calling streamed and downloaded music &quot;CD Quality&quot; when by all measures (subjective and objective) it isn&#039;t? Is anyone lobbying to kill this lie?

Bad quality is one of the main issues that keeps me from enjoying downloaded music (legal or otherwise). To my ears 320k mp3s sound very good, but you never see them.

Paul</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1190@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:31:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>