Sopranos, Episode 3 Review
Published October 03, 2002
The world's a jungle. You want my advice, Anthony? Don't expect happiness. You won't get it. People let you down...in the end, you die in your own arms.
-- Livia Soprano, giving advice to Anthony, Jr.
There's a theme of rugged individualism (dare I say, "libertarianism?") that runs through The Sopranos. At the very least, there's a sense that we're all responsible for our own actions. Such is why the show's protagonist, Tony Soprano, is subject to anxiety attacks, needs anti-depressant medication to function, and frequents a shrink. He's forever trapped by the realization that he's not a legitimate person. He can't be a father, or a husband, so long as the moral realities of his mob life continue to haunt him. He wants desperately to raise his kids right, to teach them responsibility and right-from-wrong. But he can't, because he has no moral authority to stand upon when it comes time to admonish them. "Oh, listen to you, Mr. Mob Boss," Meadow says, when he attempts to tell her she's making a mistake by skipping college for Europe. And last season, when A.J. dips into mischief after learning the truth behind his dad's "waste management business," Tony's helpless when it comes to straightening him out. Tony can hide behind the moral code of the mafia. He can attempt to lose himself in his "legitimate" life - his family. But in the end, he's challenged to reconcile the irreconcilable: he's a liar, a thief and a murderer. And that's how he makes his living. No amount of twist or spin or revisionist code he puts on those truths can change them. They are in fact truths, and the truth will continue to gnaw at Tony's soul until he owns up to it. Ultimately, he's responsible for his person.
The theme of individualism has played itself out in other aspects of the show as well. I've referenced it in a previous review, but a most telling and understated display of the theme occurred last season, when a state's witness to a murder carried out by Tony and Big Pussy was seen in his home reading Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia. Nozick was a widely respected Harvard philosopher and libertarian (or, at least, a classical liberal). He believed in a minimalist state, and that individuals ought to be held accountable for the choices they make - and they ought to be free to make them. Nozick believed that one of the few legitimate functions of the state was to protect us from one another. Just after the shot of the witness reading Nozick, he learns that the murder he witnessed was not a random act, but rather one perpetrated by the Soprano crime family. Shaken, he recants his testimony. That's a pretty powerful statement coming from the Sopranos' creators. We can't count on the state for even the most basic of governmental functions - protecting us from harm. Ultimately, we're all on our own. We die in our own arms.
- Sopranos, Episode 3 Review
- Published: October 03, 2002
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: Television
- Writer: Radley Balko
- Radley Balko's BC Writer page
- Radley Balko's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
A little early with this comment but I'm interested in what others might think anyway.
End of Season 5 - Does Tony "Find God" and enter Witness Protection or does he get knocked off by someone. In either case the show definitely ends with little hope of a sequel (Which is what Chase has said all along).
Any takers?
What I really thought was neat was the parallel that Chase drew between Carmella and Tony. If you watch carefully, you see how Carmella is treated by the other wives like Tony is with his crew. She gets a certain assumed status by virtue of her marriage (i.e. she is driven to and from the lunch, Silvio's wife stands up for her to the priest, she decides who will help out at the Bacala residence). It was subtle, but fun to watch.
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassads!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Da whole t'ing is so racis'...I hates youse bigotistic bassids!
Sorry...I hit da button too many times...I never was good at mat'.
To the writers: thank you for this critical analysis. As a common viewer of the series, I often notice double meanings and subtleties that I cannot quite verbally define. Redaing your reviews help me to make sense of all the "extra" information and themes that seem to be cleverly hidden with most great works of art particularly, in this case, the Sopranos. Thanks and please keep up the good work.
It would've certainly been a great twist in the story if Furio finally confessed his love to Carmella. I'm sure some excellent sub-stories could have originated from a confession like that. Moreover, it would've been great if Carmella just for a moment consented to fall on Furio's arms and for one time experience what her Tony does almost every week.
The writer of this article is a closed-minded, opinionated, blanket-statement-throwing pinhead. Open your mind! One small example -- Janice isn't the most irritating character to EVERYONE by a long shot! Your personal issues continually creep into your writing. Why do you assume we're all waiting for her to get knocked off? You reveal more about yourself and your troubled thinking than you realize!
Who is this "Radley" person anyway? We'd ALL like to see "the act" take place between Furio and Carmela? Speak for yourself, pal! Yeeeeeeesh...






Great Lines: You missed one by Janice's Psychiatrist. I'm afraid I'll have to paraphrase now...
"You're just going to have to sit him down, and with the grace and compassion you're so famous for, tell him that it is over."
Ha!