MusicUnited.org — A Bad Idea
Published October 01, 2002
Here's an interesting question for you: Considering that the music industry essentially dictates the shape of the youth culture, how can it be so thickheadedly clueless about talking to teens about file sharing? The latest music industry salvo in this direction is a Web site called MusicUnited.org, which is designed to bring home the point that nearly all file sharing is illegal and wrong. Let's take a moment and discuss all the ways that this site is going to fail miserably.
1. It's not a cool site. It's not cool in its intent, of course, since its intent is to keep kids from doing something they want to do, which is to share files with each other. But you can get past that if you can get your message across. The site totally screws this up right from the beginning: One of the headlines on the front page says of file sharing: "It's illegal and it's a drag!"
A drag? I mean, good Lord. I'm 33 and I winced when I saw that. It immediately calls to mind your junior high health teacher trying to use hep slang to tell you about why drugs are bad. The worst thing an adult can ever do when speaking to "the kids" is try to use current slang and fail (the second worse thing is to use it and use it correctly, and yet still sound like you have no clue). The site immediately sets itself up to be mocked purely on the basis of how it presents its message, which means the message won't even get considered.
2. The site threatens. Despite the nice (but too conservatively-designed) graphic design, the textual tone of the site is one of distinct and total menace. Every bit of text reinforces ominously that file sharing is illegal (and wrong), and that there are severe penalties if you're caught: The site's favorite bit of trivia in this respect is the maximum penalty for copyright violations, which is five years in the stony lonesome and a $250,000 fine. "Don't you have a better way to spend five years and $250,000?" asks the site.
Please. The minute the music industry actually ever pressed for the maximum sentence for copyright violations to be imposed on an actual teenager is the minute the shit really hits the fan. No one in their right mind believes that the penalty for a college student downloading the White Stripes album from Kazaa should be half a decade of prison rape and being traded in the exercise yard for a carton of Kools. If the RIAA actually pressed for this for a single casual downloader of music, the backlash of public opinion would destroy the music industry. They know it, and more importantly the kids know it, too. Waving around a big threat stick when you have no ability to use it makes you look sad, desperate and weak, which is certainly no way to get a teenager to listen to you.
- MusicUnited.org — A Bad Idea
- Published: October 01, 2002
- Type:
- Section: Music
- Writer: John Scalzi
- John Scalzi's BC Writer page
- John Scalzi's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Excellent job. I'm pinging your piece (and we all know how much that hurts) to my Digital Songstream blog. BTW, I've got an article called Talking Back to the Artists at that site, offering specific rebuttals to some of the musicians quoted in MusicUnited site.
Very well put!!! I entirely agree with you - now if the music industry people would stop looking thru their emerald glasses - maybe things would change. But alas, they have this disease called greed - which is a strikingly similar spelling to green - which happens to be the color of money...
Very well done. That site reminds me nothing so much as the Brain on Drugs ads from wayback. Not only will it not make dowdloading uncool, it will make the artists themselves look uncool for being so out of touch. By tomorrow morning there will be good parody sites - the 2002 parallel to the classic poster "This is your brain on drugs ... with bacon and toast" that hung in the cool stoner's room.
Exactly. The RIAA will lead itself to it's own demise. Thier not realizing that thier simple pushing people away from sales using thier strong arm tactics. I DL music and if I like it enough I will purchase the artist's productions. Now I will never purchase any artist supported by the RIAA. Don't they realize thier making fools of themselves and thier affiliating artists? Besides, there's so many ways around thier "network scanning" software it's pathetic! Long live FOC!
(free of charge) >Farfeg
Why listen to Britney Spears anyways (re: her quote on music)? She gets drunk, then goes and gets married for god's sake.


Very nice job, John, thanks! I couldn't agree with your assessment more.