Jesse Jackson v. Barbershop

Written by Michele Catalano
Published September 24, 2002

Jesse Jackson has asked the producers of "Barbershop" to not only apologize to him, but to cut the barbs at Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King from future DVD versions of the movie.

The character...says other blacks refused to give up their seats to whites in the segregated south, but that Rosa Parks got the credit because she was connected to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. He also directs an expletive at Jackson.

The character is immediately condemned by others in the barbershop for being disrespectful.

Let me repeat: Jackson wants the producers to remove the jokes he found offensive from future DVD releases of the Barbershop. Should they include a warning? Warning, this motion picture has been edited from its original form to appease the sensibilities of Jesse Jackson.

There are plenty of other movies that disparage the black community as well as its leaders. Why this movie in particular? Because it makes a small joke about Jackson himself? Would he be complaining as loudly if the remark was made towards Al Sharpton?

Just because a person has done good things in their life and is looked up to by millions of people does not mean he or she is free from insults, whether they be fictional or real. Even the nicest people in the world have their detractors and to want to censor a piece of fiction because a genuinely good person had a negative comment made about them is utterly ridiculous.

Imagine if everyone bullied movie studios into editing their movies so as not to contain jokes about them. Gone would be all the punchlines about Clinton, Prince Charles, Celine Dion and any other person who has achieved fame or notoriety.

Every joke ever written will offend someone somewhere on the planet. We would have nothing to read or watch or listen to if everyone went around complaining about lines in movies. Hell, everyone else in the barber shop gets on the case of the guy who makes the comments. But that doesn't matter. If Jesse doesn't like it, censor it.

If the producers actually give in and take the lines out of the DVD version, I give up.

Michele is from Long Island and writes about two of her favorite things - punk rock and fast cars -along with her better half at Faster Than the World.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Jesse Jackson v. Barbershop
Published: September 24, 2002
Type:
Section: Video: Urban
Filed Under: Video: News
Writer: Michele Catalano
Michele Catalano's BC Writer page
Michele Catalano's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Michele Catalano
Video: News
All Video: Urban Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 27, 2002 @ 17:44PM — T Brown

I have to agree with the columnist. You have to look at the joke in it's proper context. Overall, the film illustrates what a pivotal role the barbershop plays and has played in our (the African American) community throughout the years. The Barbershop is not only a place to help keep you looking nice, but it is also a business that allows the dollar to continue to circulate in our community. With its standard operating rules of no nonsense or violence, it also serves as a neutral ground or safe haven for socialization and discussion. I think that IN THIS CASE Mr. Jackson is being a bit hypersensitive and should take into consideration that the comment was made during a discussion. The person who made the comment was quickly made to understand that the comment was wrong and the film moved on. I think that it was a great example of how differences of opinions take place in barbershops and how ignorant and disrespectful comments made in that environment are dealt with in a constructive manner.

I appreciate the work of social activists like Mr. Jackson and do feel that hollywood has a track record of portraying people of color in a negative light while discounting the accomplishemnts of African American community leaders, but I don't think that was the case here.

Personally speaking, I was bothered by some aspects of the movie Friday. I didn't campaign to have it re-edited, snatched from the theaters, or criticize others for watching it. I did make a personal decision not to have anything else to do with the movie. I made a personal choice to uphold my rights as an American citizen and not watch the rest of the film regardless of how popular it was with the general populace. I also made a choice to respect the rights of others by sharing my opinion when ASKED and allowing others to enjoy the movie to their heart's content without pressing my feelings or beliefs on them.

That's what America is all about (or is supposed to be about). Freedom of choice. While I respect Mr. Jackson's opinion, I disagree with his behavior.

#2 — September 3, 2004 @ 22:44PM — lashonda [URL]

hi

#3 — September 4, 2004 @ 02:51AM — Mac Diva [URL]

The link cited doesn't exist. I would want to know more about the alleged controversy before making a blanket response. However, Rev. Jackson has usually been pretty thick-skinned. Worse has been said about him than a joke by a conservative curmudgeon in a movie. The allegation seems not to fit his character.

A legtimate gripe about the Barbershop banter is that it is often taken out of context by Right Wing white folks in their desperate efforts to find blacks who agree with them. Only one person in the movie expresses backward views. Like most of their real world counterparts, most would not give a Right Winger the time of day.

#4 — September 4, 2004 @ 03:32AM — SFC SKI

Well MD, aside from wondering why you would bother resurrecting a nearly 2 year old post,(no wonder the link is dead), I wonder why you call the views of one character, played by Cedric the Entertainer, as backward.

Did you actually see Barbershop 1 & 2? IF you had I think you would be a bit less strident in your protest.

I think that both Barbershop movies are great films, and not just because one character's dialogue supposedly confirms Evil White America's views.

Please climb down off the victim horse, MD, there are plenty of things that you right that I enjoy reading, but you are predictable and repetitive when it comes to things like this.

#5 — September 4, 2004 @ 16:33PM — Mac Diva [URL]

I didn't resurrect the thread, Ski.

However, it can be interesting to look at an old claim. Nothing came of this except the issue I brought up -- misuse of the character to suggest much more agreement with white conservatives among African-Americans than there is.

#6 — October 22, 2005 @ 21:58PM — JD

How in the hell can anything offend a piece of shit like Jesse Jackson, surely he used to this shit by now, people have been making jokes and slandering him for years.

#7 — August 15, 2007 @ 22:52PM — BIG CHIEF

WHO THE HELL DOES JESSIE JACKSON THINK HE IS?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/778)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!