Rowling Vindicated
Written by Eric Olsen
Published September 19, 2002
Published September 19, 2002
J.K. Rowling owns "muggles" and whatnot:
- A federal court on Wednesday threw out author Nancy Stouffer's claims that Rowling, the author of the blockbuster Harry Potter ( news - web sites) books, stole words and characters from Stouffer's books. The claims were made against Rowling and her U.S. publisher and movie producer.
Partly at issue was ownership of the trademark and copyrights to "muggles." In Rowling's books, "muggles" is the name wizards give to humans who have no magical abilities. Stouffer had used the term to describe mythical characters in her books for children.
But the U.S. District Court for southern New York found not only that Rowling did not pilfer the muggles, but also that Stouffer had lied to the court and doctored evidence to support her claims. The court fined Stouffer $50,000 for this "pattern of intentional bad faith conduct."
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
- Rowling Vindicated
- Published: September 19, 2002
- Type:
- Section: Books: Children
- Filed Under: Books: News, Video: Family
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/677)Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Friday's Wall Street Journal has a update on the status of the fifth Harry Potter book.