How big is the Next Big Thing?
Published August 27, 2002
You've already heard of most (if not all) of these bands. Hell, you may have read about them in Newsweek. In the past year, they have increasingly become staples of rock writing in any publication brave enough to touch the subject. The British music press, as usual, seems to have the most blind enthusiasm in endorsing them. The Strokes, The White Stripes, The Hives, The Vines, The Yeah Yeah Yeahs, The Catheters... these are The Next Big Things. These are The Bands That Will Save Rock and Roll. Any such declaration begs two questions at the same time: Does rock and roll need saving? And is this what rock and roll is?
Let's take the second question first. Given the evidence presented in the music press as of late, rock and roll is a heady, abrasive sound, agressive in execution and ancient in structure. Rock and roll is simply four-bar blues cranked up to maximum volume, loaded with swaggering attitude and sweat and grime and — most importantly — spunk. Every one of these records drips with testosterone, whether the vocalist is male or female. Rock and roll seems to be, more than anything, a delirious male sexual ecstacy, a screaming ejaculation, a glorious unloading of pent up sexual tension. In other words, rock and roll is a big swinging dick.
I'm not necessarily making judgements on this analysis. It may, in fact, be very correct. But if these are the big swinging dicks that are going to save our souls, shouldn't we take a long, hard look at how big and swinging they really are? Assuming that rock needs more cock, are these bands really up to the job? After all, size does matter.
I have rated each band on two criteria: "length," or the immediate impressiveness of the sound, and "girth," the true measure of how much meat is actually there. The average for length is 6, and the average for girth is 5.
The Strokes
Julian Casablancas sets the tone for Is This It in the first lines. "Can't you see I'm trying? / I don't even like it." The honest simplicity of this adolescent theme comes up again and again on the record, through numerous tales of failed or sure-to-fail relationships. "Alone we stand / together we fall apart," he tells one anonymous girl, and we believe him. In fact, he makes himself sound like the worst boyfriend in the world — noncomittal, wishy-washy, sex-obsessed. But it takes balls to admit to being that much of a hopeless male. He always scores points for trying, even when he's bound to fail.
- How big is the Next Big Thing?
- Published: August 27, 2002
- Type:
- Section: Music
- Filed Under: Music: Alternative Rock, Music: Hard Rock, Music: Rock
- Writer: Kenan Hebert
- Kenan Hebert's BC Writer page
- Kenan Hebert's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
K, Per Glenn's post, you can go back and connect all of these to Amazon (please). Looks like not everyone digs the analogy. I think it's pretty funny.
Given Thom's choice of vernacular, I'm guessing he's British. Was it the swipe at the British music press that so offended him? Or my opinions?
Or maybe it was all those penises. Not everyone like a lot of penises. Brash American that I am, I don't mind so much, but...
A Bangsian treat, dear boy. If Blogcritics is going to be more than just hundreds of disconnected "if you liked their last album you might like this" capsule reviews it's going to need stylish pieces with some sharp wit like this. More, please.
And if you want to see Kenan doing it straight, go see the pieces on Pet Sounds and Funhouse back at his home page.
"I knocked 'em dead in Dallas
And I didn't pay my dues
Yeah, I knocked 'em dead in Dallas
They didn't know we were Jews"
Hey, why no mention of The Kills? They are at least as minimalist as these other guys.
The judge who put coded messages in his Da Vinci Code plagiarism trial ruling has written another...










...what a load of bollocks.