<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Warrior Politics by Robert Kaplan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 13:34:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin Murphy on Warrior Politics by Robert Kaplan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/08/23/083305.php#comment-716728</link>
<description>If by traditional, you mean the Latin definition, you&#039;d be correct.  However, since Mr. Kagan wrote in English, and as his book makes abundantly clear he was referring to the pre-Christian Western ethos when he referred to Pagan Ethos, you&#039;re wrong.

You&#039;d be amazed what 2,000 years can do to a word&#039;s meaning.  Just look what happened to hacker over 30 years.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">716728@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 13:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by quixotal on Warrior Politics by Robert Kaplan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/08/23/083305.php#comment-716553</link>
<description>Wow, old blog, but pagan does not mean someone who is not a christian or jew. You have to first properly define the term before you criticize its use. The traditional meaning of pagan is &quot;country&quot;, as in simple country person...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">716553@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 18:35:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>