<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Springsteen and Earle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:10:31 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Scott Butki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/08/20/110803.php#comment-320163</link>
<description>Interesting comparison. But I think you left out the main difference between the two albums - Springsteen&#039;s, while great, tells us what we want to hear whereas Earle&#039;s makes us think and ask questions. And isn&#039;t that a good thing?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320163@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:10:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>