Book Review: Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World
Published August 19, 2002
The book is peppered with clever little images and vignettes, as when a salesgirl describes Bob Dylan's voice as "like a kid standing at the window watching the rain," or this bit:
When at last I awoke, it was half light out. The clock read six-fifteen, but I couldn't tell whether it was morning or evening. I pulled on a pair of slacks and leaned out my door to check the neighbor's doormat. The morning edition was lying there, which led me to conclude it was morning. Subscribing to a paper comes in handy at times like this. Maybe I ought to.
but these bits are scattered enough that one wonders if he wouldn't be better off writing haiku:
Clock says six-fifteen,
But morning? or evening?
Look on the doormat.
(Yeah, yeah, yeah, it doesn't mention nature, so it's a senryu... I never said I was Basho.)
The plot might've seemed more inventive in 1985-- it's tough to say. I couldn't help feeling, though, that I've seen the same basic idea done elsewhere, and with better characters.
Annoyingly, the fact that this is an early novel means that I still probably haven't given Murakami a fair try, and I'll continue to feel guilty whenever I pass over one of his books in the store. Maybe I'll check his new short-story collection out of the library, or something...
(BlogCritics note: This was originally posted on The Library of Babel, my book log, which is not the more general blog that's linked off my name below.)
- Book Review: Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World
- Published: August 19, 2002
- Type: Review
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: Literature and Fiction
- Writer: Chad Orzel
- Chad Orzel's BC Writer page
- Chad Orzel's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
Your review is inaccurate because when you make the comparisons between the two worlds, or "consciousnesses", in the book, you phrase it as if it is stated early on in the book that the main character is "shuffling data with his subconscious", which is not the case. In actuality the whole concept between shuffling is something that isn't entirely reveled until about halfway through the novel, and even then, so what?
Is it really the purpose of novel to be completely unpredictable? I don't think people should assume the character has no personality. (my opinion)
Think about it this way -- The main character here is somebody who's entire world is being turned upside down, and even then, finds the opportunity reflects on aspects of his life, and yes, pop-culture, revealing little pieces of his personality. Suppose your right and the author did indeed fail to give the reader any indication that the main character had a personality. Well, you read the book, isn't the main characters brain different than most peoples to begin with? (I won't go into further detail, because I don't want to give anything away).
Anyways, we're dealing with a story that is written about the mind, the unconscious, and crazy experiments. Personality of the main character shouldn't be a huge factor in rating this book.
I want to let it be known that I am not a science-fiction fan, but the author of this novel so beautifully writes this book as to make it seem like something almost feasible. Never even thought of it as science-fiction, despite how crazy things get, because the character is right there with you saying "What the hell???"
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/144)
I don't think you're being fair to the book. Admitidly, I'm doing an assignment on it and I do have somewhat of a background on Japanese culture which helps. It's all about losing your mind, your identity and mind pollution. That it's presented so flatly without real identities for the characters is part of this. Also it's full of fairytale references and ideas such as the unicorns and the INKlings. INKlings are Infra-nocturnal Kappas(as explained in the book) and Kappas are water monsters/deities which protect the water from pollution, however in this case because they surround the professor and his lab and threaten it they can be interperated as being protectors of the mind. There's lots of little thing through out the book, like Kappas, that you can watch out for eg the paperclips, unicorns and the tons of references to right hand not knowing what the left hand does ( both with the system and with the mind). Maybe try reading it again and watching out for some of these sign posts. After a while you find yourself thinking 'what is up with these frickin paperclips?!' I enjoyed it and I hope this help you to enjoy it too.