Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Adding Tremendous Insult to Horrendous Injury

Adding Tremendous Insult to Horrendous Injury

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

As most of you know by now, the Manchin-Toomey amendment to the S.649 firearms bill was defeated. A filibuster by the Republicans forced a 60 vote requirement for the bill to pass and the count fell six votes short.

In a situation in which 86 percent of Americans want expanded background checks, (according to a CNN/ORC International poll released last week), you would think that a more or less equal percentage of the senators would vote in favor of an amendment which calls for just that. In a country where elected officials do their job and carry out the wishes of their constituencies, you would be right but, judging by this vote, the United States is not that country. No, in this country many politicians’ only agenda is to get into office again. I don’t use the term re-elected because it seems to have little meaning anymore. We think we elect our representatives, but all we really do is choose the person best able to convince us of their sincerity and dedication to our cause.

Once in Washington, their sincerity and dedication go to the highest bidder, selling the only thing they have to offer: their vote. There is no other way to look at this. This particular amendment was not an attempt to correct a potentially problematic situation. It was not a theoretical or preemptive fix. No, this amendment came on the heels of a terrible tragedy but even an appeal from the grieving parents of the children killed in Newtown, did nothing to budge the senators loyalty to the NRA and their money.

It’s not enough to give a vote count. It is important to know the names of those who sold out. They are:

Lamar Alexander Tennessee (R)
Kelly Ayotte New Hampshire (R)
John Barrasso Wyoming (R)
Max Baucus Montana (D)
Mark Begich Alaska (D)
Roy Blunt Missouri (R)
John Boozman Arkansas (R)
Richard Burr North Carolina (R)
Saxby Chambliss Georgia (R)
Dan Coats Indiana (R)
Tom Coburn Oklahoma (R)
Thad Cochran Mississippi (R)
Bob Corker Tennessee (R)
John Cornyn Texas (R)
Michael Dean Crapo Idaho (R)
Ted Cruz Texas (R)
Mike Enzi Wyoming (R)
Deb Fischer Nebraska (R)
Jeff Flake Arizona (R)
Lindsey Graham South Carolina (R)
Chuck Grassley Iowa (R)
Orrin Hatch Utah (R)
Heidi Heitkamp North Dakota (D)
Dean Heller Nevada (R)
John Hoeven North Dakota (R)
Jim Inhofe Oklahoma (R)
John Hardy Isakson Georgia (R)
Mike Johanns Nebraska (R)

Ron Johnson Wisconsin (R)
Mike Lee Utah (R)
Mitch McConnell Kentucky (R)
Jerry Moran Kansas (R)
Lisa Murkowski Alaska (R)
Rand Paul Kentucky (R)
Rob Portman Ohio (R)
Mark Pryor Arkansas (D)
Harry Reid Nevada (D)**
James Risch Idaho (R)
Pat Roberts Kansas (R)
Marco Rubio Florida (R)
Tim Scott South Carolina (R)
Jefferson Sessions Alabama (R)
Richard Shelby Alabama (R)
John Thune South Dakota (R)
David Vitter Louisiana (R)
Roger Wicker Mississippi (R)

Note that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, cast a “no” vote only to secure the ability to bring the measure up again.

Four Republicans joined most Democrats in supporting the compromise, voting in line with the wishes of their constituency and heeding the urgently obvious moral imperative They did their job as it should be done and must be acknowledged here. They are:

Susan Collins Maine (R)
Mark Kirk Illinois (R)
John McCain Arizona (R)
Pat Toomey Pennsylvania (R)

Conversely, three Democrats were the worst sell-outs of them all, betraying their party, their president, and worst of all, all those who voted for them. In essence, they gave us the finger when they voted “No.” They are:

Max Baucus Montana (D)
Mark Begich Alaska (D)
Mark Pryor Arkansas (D)

President Obama called it a, “Pretty shameful day for Washington” and wondered, “Who are we here to represent?” An excellent question to which we, unfortunately, now have a clear answer: the NRA!

In this morning’s Opinion Pages of The New York Times, Gabrielle Giffords, in an op-ed piece titled “A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip,” writes of those who voted against the measure:<blockquote>They will try to hide their decision behind grand talk, behind willfully false accounts of what the bill might have done — trust me, I know how politicians talk when they want to distract you — but their decision was based on a misplaced sense of self-interest. I say misplaced, because to preserve their dignity and their legacy, they should have heeded the voices of their constituents. They should have honored the legacy of the thousands of victims of gun violence and their families, who have begged for action, not because it would bring their loved ones back, but so that others might be spared their agony.</blockquote>No one could have said it any better!

In the meantime, the NRA promised political retribution against supporters of tougher gun laws, calling the expanded background checks a first step toward a national gun registry and government confiscation of firearms. As President Obama put it, “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill. It came down to politics.” These days, it seems, politics equals a betrayal of public trust.

Senator Harry Reid warned Republicans that the strong majority of Americans who support expanded background checks won’t forget votes against the Manchin-Toomey compromise. “The American people … have a long, long memory,” he said. Yes, we most certainly do……

Powered by

About A. J. Aston

  • pablo

    I for one am all for background checks on pressure cookers, and even more people that use them should be licensed as well. Makes sense to me. :)

  • John Lake

    Sarcasm in the face of loss of life misses the mark. If we had a real democracy, gun ownership would be strictly limited, and background checks would be strict. The age of guns is over. A gun is a device used for killing. If non-living targets are used, they invariably represent living entities: ie: a bulls eye, the heart of a deer. At the time the Constitution decreed a right to bear arms, the west was hazardous, with resisting Indians, and armed bandits. This is no longer the case.
    We should probably study the motivation of those who perpetrate violent terrorism. World religions are certainly a right, but over generations, they can be modified in the light of truth, and wisdom.

  • A. J. Aston

    John, adhering to laws written centuries ago without making any modifications to reflect changes is to create disparity between such laws and those they are supposed to govern. The Catholic Church is a perfect example. I do not speak of other religions as I am not familiar enough with them to make this point, though I suspect that neither Judaism nor Islam have “modernized” themselves either.

    Pablo, that your comment makes sense to you, is not surprising…..

  • Dr Dreadful

    The effect is seldom duplicated in his readers… :-)

  • Glenn Contrarian

    John –

    If we had a real democracy, gun ownership would be strictly limited, and background checks would be strict. The age of guns is over. A gun is a device used for killing. If non-living targets are used, they invariably represent living entities: ie: a bulls eye, the heart of a deer. At the time the Constitution decreed a right to bear arms, the west was hazardous, with resisting Indians, and armed bandits. This is no longer the case.

    Quoted for truth!

  • pablo

    if the age of guns is over why do the piggies have so many of them, the same is true of their counterparts, which look so much like the piggies today. why they have so many of them, and want more if the age of guns is over?

  • pablo

    In fact I bet if you were around John back before we invaded iraq without a declaration of war as required by the constitution, you would have been the first to be pointing to the so called weapons of destruction saddam had.

  • John Lake

    Pablo: I suspect you predict my forthcoming criticisms of George W. Bush at the dedication of his library in Texas. Hopefully that article (granting it’s posting) will answer any questions one may have.