NEWS

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest Sails Past $300m Despite Critical Keelhauling

Written by Eric Olsen
Published July 24, 2006

After three record-breaking weekends, it would appear the other shoe is never going to drop for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest. The continued adventures of Captain Jack Sparrow and a whole lot of commotion in the Caribbean remained atop the North American movie box office for the third straight weekend, liberating $35 million from the film-going public and lifting its total to $321.7 million after just 17 days.

Pirates2DeppKnightley Chest has already passed the $305 million domestic total that 2003's Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl accumulated in its entire theatrical run.

Despite a dismal 54% rating by the nation's film critics as collected on the Rotten Tomatoes site, Chest keeps rolling to record after record, and by now the critics can't claim they haven't had a chance to "warn" the public yet. The public just doesn't seem to care much about what they have to say - a few examples from the cinematocracy:

"Gone is much of the humor and originality of the first movie"; "Rum, monotony, and the lash"; "It's often unclear what's going on, beyond a zillion dollars of splashy effects washing over the screen"; "This Disney movie isn't a follow-up to the first Pirates of the Caribbean so much as its empty-calorie clone"; "Although there are memorable bits and pieces, the new Pirates of the Caribbean is a movie with no particular interest in coherence, economy or feeling."

POTCDavyJones And frankly, the critics aren't all wrong. Compared to the original Pirates, there is a lot more action and crazy CGI, less wit and character development, less nobility on display, and an even more complex but less clever plot involving Sparrow's soul-debt to Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), Will (Orlando Bloom) and Elizabeth (Keira Knightley) and issues with the East India Trading Company, ex-Commodore Norrington (Jack Davenport) seeking to "get his life back," cannibals, a voodoo queen, a humorless kraken, and an undead monkey.

Pirates2Trio But despite these dire warnings, the Johnny Depp swashbuckler sequel shows no sign of walking the plank, breaking a new record every weekend. It broke the all-time opening weekend record with $135.6 million, became the movie to reach $200 million most rapidly in its second weekend, and Saturday became the quickest to $300 million, beating the mark set last year by Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith.

Dead Man's Chest should top the $339.7 million domestic take of Finding Nemo to become Disney's top-grossing movie ever within the next week. Many are the roguish smiles around the Disney plantation. "There are lots of plateaus for us to continue to strive for," said Chuck Viane, Disney's head of distribution.

Perhaps this Pirates crew thinks it can scuttle the mighty Titanic. Either way, Pirates 3 is set up for a monster opening in May of next year.

Blogcritics reviews of the film have been generally far more enthusiastic than the national media's, as follows: Dan Traeger, John Guilfoil, Iloz Zoc, Neil Miller.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest Sails Past $300m Despite Critical Keelhauling
Published: July 24, 2006
Type: News
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Film and TV Business, Video: Adventure, Video: News
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: Film and TV Business
Video: Adventure
Video: News
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 24, 2006 @ 17:39PM — DJRadiohead [URL]

Ahoy, EO! Sorry. Had to do that. TWTWIM and I were bitterly disappointed in 2. We, like your family, loved the first. This one? Well, you diagnosed it beautifully. The plot was more complex but not more compelling and plot isn't what sold the first movie. The emphasis on effects and action took away from what made the first movie work: Johnny Depp. The scenes with the natives were useless and bloated a film that was too long.

I hope they get the mojo back with 3.

#2 — July 24, 2006 @ 20:13PM — John Guilfoil [URL]

Maybe the moral of the story is, movies don't have to be good...as long as there's pirates...

I was quoted in the Wall Street Journal on Friday talking about the extreme length of the movie, but Pirates has defied all critics and logic.

Good for them...sure, that's it...

#3 — July 25, 2006 @ 11:50AM — Kay Diego

This movie is cinematic excellence! It deserves to be performing as well as it is. Screw the critics - they don't make make up our minds for us, and the numbers prove it!

#4 — July 25, 2006 @ 15:04PM — Eric Olsen

there's the range of critical opinion in three comments!

#5 — July 25, 2006 @ 15:10PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

i haven't seen this movie...or the first one, for that matter.

...just thought that we needed a comment from the movie luddite section.

#6 — July 25, 2006 @ 15:21PM — Nancy

I suspect a lot of the charm of Pirates #1 was its element of surprise: you never knew what to expect from most of the elements, not least Capt. Jack, but even the Commodore was a surprise: a decent, honorable, likeable man, even tho at first glance you were sure he was going to be the heavy by being such a prig. Ditto the governor. Ditto the Girl. Ditto the villain - who'd'a thunk he had such wit ("we named the monkey 'Jack'") & was capable of restraint...even manners, on occasion. With this movie, that element of surprise is gone. We know what Jack is like, ditto the Girl, ditto the Hero, even ditto the monkey, so the best part of the edge is off #2, which meant the plot had to be even better, to take up the slack. IMO it suffices just fine. A little long, could have been a little tighter in the telling, but I liked it just fine.

As for critics, they're a bunch of self-satisfied, self-important, self-appointed airbags anyway, who don't seem to like anything unless it's Deep & Meaningful - and usually an art house or foreign film. As #3 says, critics don't make up my mind; if anything, whatever they say they dislike I figure I'll generally like. Poop on them.

#7 — July 25, 2006 @ 15:30PM — Eric Olsen

Mark, check out the first one - I'm almost positive you'd enjoy it.

Nancy, though I'm a bit less negative toward the professional critics than you, your assessment of the he movies and the differences between them is brilliance!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/50725)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments